Translations, from Portuguese, are automatic. If you notice any errors in the text, help us identify them, clicking here.
Subscribe to our Newsletters and receive our articles directly in your email.
In our last mediumistic study meeting, after several evocations, we decided, seriously and confidently, and feeling that it was an opportune moment, to seek some guidance, albeit indirectly, from the Spirit of Allan Kardec, the codifier of Spiritism. The medium, in psychophony, after a few moments of concentration, begins to speak in a quite different manner, more serious and deliberate, and gives the following communication:
I observe the division of groups within the consoling doctrine that was transmitted to me by the superior Spirits, and which they themselves had warned me about regarding all these incongruities and deviations that would occur. There are, however, groups that seek to follow the steps and methodology of what I myself did, following the advice offered to me by so many dedicated friends. I feel, however, the resistance of many who still insist on mysticism, dogma, the inversion of words, and distortions of the doctrine's foundational content.
Together with my Higher Spirits who accompanied me on this journey, I seek to send inspiration to those who are open to receiving it, in order to restore what has been distorted since my absence. Our group grows, supported by the blessings of God the Almighty Father. Our understanding today is much greater than it ever was, but we still do not have all the answers.
We would like the true Spiritism, the one that will transform humanity and bring about the era of Regeneration, to be disseminated correctly. The work in this task will be hard. Trials will come. Many will succumb. But Spiritism will always be alive and will survive the blows of those who remain attached to false beliefs. God's designs are clear. The laws are clear, immutable.
May those who seek me seek beyond. I am merely one among many who spread the truth and wish to instill in hearts what Jesus brought to us more than 2000 years ago. May Spiritism be for you the true and comforting light. May it continue to progress, evolve, transforming minds and hearts. I wish you success in this great work of reconstruction, even if time does not allow you to glimpse, in this life, the seeds you are planting.
May God bless you.
After the communication ended, we conducted our usual analysis, this one in particular with great attention. We found nothing in it that contradicted the expected seriousness, nor any idea that was contrary to Spiritism, historical facts, or Kardec's ideas. Whether it was Kardec himself, or a Spirit designated by him, we do not know, but we are already fully happy to see once again the assertion proven that the Spirits do not leave unanswered or unwelcome those who have seriousness and honest intentions in seeking communications.
In addition to our own analysis, we decided to submit it to NotebookLM, comparing it with all of Kardec's work. To the first question, whether there were any inconsistencies, we obtained the following answer:
When comparing the excerpt of the communication attributed to the Spirit of Allan Kardec provided in your consultation with the available sources, no fundamental doctrinal inconsistencies were found.. On the contrary, the content of the message reflects central concerns and methodological principles that Allan Kardec vigorously defended throughout his life, especially in his later years and in his fundamental works.
Below, I present a detailed analysis of the points in the message compared with the sources:
1. The Division of Groups and the Warnings from the Spirits
• Message: “I observe the division of groups… and that they themselves [the Spirits] had warned me about all these incongruities and deviations…”
• Sources: Kardec was, in fact, repeatedly warned by the Spirits about attempts at division and the struggles that Spiritism would face. The Spirit Erastus, for example, explicitly warned: “I am not unaware… that everything will be used to sow division among you; that ambushes will be set for you… that you will be set against one another.” Kardec recognized that the formation of sects and divergent systems was inevitable at the beginning, driven by the pride and ambition of certain individuals, but that unity would be achieved through the force of circumstances and the universality of the teachings.
2. Emphasis on Methodology
• Message: “However, there are groups that seek to follow in the footsteps and methodology of what I myself did…”
• Sources: The defense of a specific methodology is the cornerstone of Kardec's work. He insisted that Spiritism was not the product of personal opinion, but the result of the "collective and concordant teaching of the Spirits." The method he advocated was not to blindly accept what the Spirits said, but to submit everything to "universal control" and the scrutiny of reason and logic. He affirmed that those who did not follow this method of universal concordance and based themselves on isolated opinions would be subject to error and to creating ephemeral systems. Therefore, the appreciation of groups that follow this methodology is perfectly consistent with the Codifier's thinking.
3. Combating Mysticism and Dogmas
• Message: “…resistance from many who still cling to mysticism and dogma…”
• Sources: Kardec worked tirelessly to separate Spiritism from mysticism and the supernatural, presenting it as a science of observation and a rational philosophy.
◦ On Mysticism: He asserted that Spiritism does not accept facts described as miraculous or supernatural, explaining them through natural laws, and it combated practices that could lead to fanaticism or superstition. He explicitly stated: "Spiritism is a positive science that destroys the last vestiges of the miraculous.".
◦ Regarding Dogmas: Kardec reiterated that Spiritism is not a religion constituted with priests and particular dogmas. He criticized blind faith and defended that unwavering faith is that which can face reason head-on. He also warned against Spirits who try to impose absolute or dogmatic systems, considering this a sign of ignorance or mystification.
4. Word Inversion and Distortions
• Message: “…they insist… on inverting words and distorting the core content of the doctrine.”
• Sources: Kardec was aware that words and principles could be misinterpreted or distorted. He took care to create neologisms (such as "Spiritism" and "perispirit") precisely to avoid confusion of terms and ensure clarity of definitions. He also observed that adversaries and false friends would try to distort the spirit of the doctrine or create contradictory systems. The very history of posthumous adulterations of his works (such as The Genesis and Heaven and hell) confirms the factual existence of these "distortions of the contents of the doctrine's foundation" mentioned in the message.
Conclusion
The message attributed to the spirit of Allan Kardec is in complete agreement with the thoughts, style, and concerns expressed by the Codifier during his lifetime. The sources demonstrate that he:
1. He anticipated and combated divisions based on personalism.
2. He advocated a rigorous method of universal control and rationality.
3. He categorically rejected superstitious mysticism and dogmatic imposition.
4. He feared and warned against the alteration and distortion of the fundamental principles of the Doctrine.
Then, regarding the question "what in this communication could be doubtful," we obtained:
Allan Kardec's analysis of any communication, even if originating from his own spiritual guide (as "Akar" is identified or identifies himself), would be based on a unwavering methodological rigor, aiming to ensure the purity of the doctrine against mystification.
Even considering that the content of the message is of high morality and logical coherence (Characteristics of Superior Spirits), Kardec would raise the following points as doubtful or that would require rigorous scrutiny and control:
1. The Question of Identity (Authenticity of the Name)
Although the message itself is humble and wise, the first point of doubt would be the assurance of the identity of the person who signed it.
- Usurpation of Names: Kardec knew that inferior Spirits (pseudo-wise or mystifiers) frequently They usurp respectable and revered names. to give more weight to their words and impose their utopias. The Spirit that presents itself must be judged by the language and maxims it formulates, for a Spirit that called itself Fénelon, for example, and offended common sense and morality, would prove the hoax.
- Appearance of Wisdom: Deceiving Spirits “"They can imitate everything, everything, except true knowledge and true feeling."”. Therefore, even the wisdom demonstrated in Akar's message would have to be verified by teaching agreement. The wisdom and logic present in the text only prove that it is a Spirit of a certain elevation, but they do not necessarily attest to the historical identity that he implies.
2. The Concept of “Our Group Grows”
The emphasis on the formation and growth of a specific "group" could raise concerns about the risk of exclusivism and schisms, which Kardec vehemently opposed.
- Risks of Cult Formation: Kardec warned that ambition and pride lead Spirits to create particular systems and to link their names to an innovation. When a Spirit incites separation or isolation among followers, this betrays its inferiority.
- Universal Remote Control: The Spiritist Doctrine is not the privilege of a single Spirit, but is the result of... universality of the teaching of the Spirits. Akar declares that his group “"grows"” (Our group is growing), which, for Kardec, would be less important than the quality of unity and adherence to universal doctrine. He would insist on knowing if this group preaches to unity or a separation from the other rows.
- Avoid Personal Superiority: Although Akar's claim that he is “"just another one"” If propagating the truth is a sign of moral superiority, Kardec would use the principle of humility to guard against any attempt to establish this "group" as the only true source, because every Spirit that “"intends to have the privilege of truth"” It is inferior.
3. Revelations about Struggles and the Future
Although Spiritist Doctrine includes the prediction of future struggles (trials and persecutions), Kardec was cautious regarding the nature of these predictions and the actions resulting from them.
- Infallibility Guarantee: Kardec kept repeating that “"The spirits possess neither supreme wisdom nor supreme knowledge."”, ...and that their knowledge is limited to their level of refinement. Therefore, Spiritist Doctrine requires that isolated ideas be accepted with... reservations.
- Predictions of Dates/Material Facts: Akar's communication does not contain specific dates, but it is a warning about the harshness of... “"evidence"” and that “"Many will succumb."”. Kardec accepted premonitions of future events when useful, but distrusted circumstantial predictions, especially regarding material facts and fixed dates, as these are indications of... mystification.
In short, Kardec would use the principle of Universal Control of the Teaching of Spirits (comparing this message with others received in different centers and mediums) and the riddle of reason to confirm the authenticity and purity of all points raised by Akar, ensuring that the doctrine did not deviate into the dogmatism or mysticism.
We note that the analyses made by NotebookLM are very relevant, proving to be a very useful tool in mediumistic research. However, when it talks about... group, We note that the communication does not refer to something exclusive, but rather to a group of Spirits seeking to spread the truth. Furthermore, we do not notice anything..., in this communication, which points to problems of mysticism or deception. In fact, we think that everything about it demonstrates the character one would expect, as we have already said.
Finally, we leave this communication for the appreciation of others, and also as an encouragement to resume mediumistic research, which requires the formation of many groups, doing the same everywhere, and collaborating to carry out Kardec's method.
Reading Recommendations (Books)
- Free PDFs by Kardec – https://bit.ly/3sXXBxk
- Autonomy – The Untold History of Spiritism: https://amzn.to/3PIvbyy
- Allan Kardec's Legacy: https://amzn.to/3RIn2gv
- Final point – the reunion with spiritualism with Allan Kardec: https://amzn.to/48PLaE7
- Neither Heaven nor Hell – The Laws of the Soul According to Spiritism: https://amzn.to/3F2voYO
- Genesis – Miracles and Predictions According to Spiritism (unadulterated): Free PDF or https://amzn.to/3RM91hF
- Heaven and Hell: Or divine justice according to Spiritism (unadulterated): Free PDF or https://amzn.to/3ZGrcal
- Spiritist Revolution. Allan Kardec's forgotten theory: https://amzn.to/3t7HIUH
- Mesmer. The denied science of animal magnetism: https://amzn.to/3PYc1X2
- The Book of Mediums: https://amzn.to/3PDNTHK
- The Spirits' Book: https://amzn.to/3QkcFx9
- Spiritist Magazine – complete collection: https://amzn.to/48Uxh7s
- Practical Instructions on Spiritist Manifestations: https://amzn.to/3QiR8Gc
- Spiritism in its Simplest Expression: https://amzn.to/3M6fXT5
Português do Brasil 
English 
Français 
Español
Very interesting, an exhortation to the correct paths of the Kardecist method and the support of good Spirits in the work. Continue this dissemination, which strengthens the Spiritist doctrine, so forgotten today.
Thank you so much for your support! It's necessary to return to the naturalness of Spiritist Doctrine 🙏
Great! To see work seeking the truth with such seriousness.
Thank you very much, my friend!
Dear Fellow Members, excellent initiative, exactly as the illustrious codifier did. Indeed, he himself tells us that we need to study, compare, and delve deeper, a methodological guideline that emphasizes the importance of serious study, comparative analysis of teachings, and deepening knowledge as a basis for the secure development of Spiritism. With due respect to the Master of Lyon, I add "practice" to this methodological guideline, for it is practice that will allow the Doctrine of the Spirits to consolidate in each of its followers, promoting intellectual, moral, and spiritual growth! Congratulations!!
Thank you, friend! I'd also like to recommend the article “Why do we evoke Allan Kardec?“
Applying Aksakof's "filters" found in the text:
1. The Filter of Intellectual Content (Memory and Latent Knowledge)
Aksakof states that if the content of the message does not exceed the intellectual level or knowledge stored in the medium's memory, one should assume the hypothesis of animism (the medium's own spirit acting).
Analysis: The message deals with themes widely known in current Spiritist circles: divisions within the movement, a return to Kardec, regeneration, and the figure of Jesus. There are no new facts, unknown historical revelations, or unprecedented biographical details that the medium could not have known.
Aksakof's verdict: Since the content falls within the "latent ideas" and cultural repertoire of any modern spiritualist, the most likely hypothesis is that it is a product of the medium's somnambulistic consciousness, accessing their own memories and convictions.
2. The Identity and Style Filter (The “Personal Equation”)
Aksakof emphasizes that identity is the most difficult point in Spiritism. To prove that it is Allan Kardec, the spirit would need to present characteristic traits of its personality (writing style, language, way of thinking) that are independent of the medium.
Analysis:
Style: The text presents an emotional and slightly mystical tone (“God the Father Almighty”, “blessings”). The historical Kardec (Professor Rivail) had a pedagogical, logical, cold, and extremely rational style, rarely using Catholic or mystical terminology.
Language: The message is in modern Portuguese. Aksakof considers it strong evidence when the medium speaks or writes in a language they do not know (xenoglossia). If the medium knows Portuguese, and the "spirit" speaks Portuguese using the medium's vocabulary, there is no proof of identity.
Aksakof's verdict: The lack of unmistakable traits of Kardec's personality (such as the use of the French language or his Socratic argumentative style) suggests a personification (Personalism), where the medium's unconscious creates a "character" based on what he imagines Kardec to be.
3. The "Mirror" Filter (Telepathy and Group Desires)
Aksakof and Hartmann agree that mediums in a trance state are highly suggestible and tend to reflect the thoughts and desires of those present.
Analysis: The message validates the group (“Our group is growing…”), criticizes the opponents (“resistance from many”), and praises current efforts. This is classic animism: the medium captures the group's unconscious desire to be “approved” by the codifier and produces a message that confirms these expectations.
Aksakof's verdict: Communications that systematically agree with the circle's opinions are suspected of being mental reflections (mind reading or self-suggestion) and not independent entities. Proof of identity would be stronger if the spirit said something that contradicted the medium's beliefs or desires.
Analytical Conclusion
According to Alexandre Aksakof's criteria, this message would be classified as a phenomenon of Animism or Personism.
There is no proof of identity (unknown facts, posthumous secrets, original handwriting or style).
There is no intellectual advancement (the content is generic and repetitive).
There are indications of mirroring (the message says exactly what the group wants to hear).
What would be necessary to pass the criterion? If the message contained a specific detail of Kardec's life unknown to the medium and those present (e.g., the location of a document lost in Paris, later confirmed), or if it was given in 19th-century French (in case the medium did not know French), then, according to Aksakof, we would have crossed the boundary from Animism to Spiritism.
PS: If the goal is to be "scientific," without consulting the medium, ask questions in French!
Applying Kardec's scientific method, very well explained in The Book of Mediums and in the almost twelve years of the Spiritist Review, which we observe you have not yet had the pleasure of studying and learning about:
Regarding point #1:
Furthermore, you make a central methodological error: you absolutize Aksakof's auxiliary criteria as if they were necessary conditions.
Aksakof never claimed that xenoglossia, unknown facts, or original linguistic style are universal requirements for validation. They are strong indicators when they occur, not eliminatory filters when they do not. His statement, moreover, according to a very superficial and biased understanding of Aksakof's proposal, would practically invalidate all of Spiritism.. The problem is that, since you only studied The Spirits' Book and The Gospel According to Spiritism, you don't know that Kardec presents several evocations, in the Spiritist Review, made to Spirits who, in life, spoke only English, German, Turkish, Hindi, etc., without any communication problems.
Regarding point #2:
It is quite evident that, as long as the communication is not particular, but philosophical and moral—that is, as long as it does not depend on the certainty of the Spirit's identity—this certainty is not necessary and, indeed, is often impossible. Even if it is not Kardec, this does not invalidate the communication, and if someone claims it is animism, they need to demonstrate doctrinal incongruity, not merely the absence of extraordinary proof.
Regarding point #3:
The Spirit refers not to our group (Study Group The Legacy of Allan Kardec or Semear Group). This is explicitly stated, moreover, at the end of the article: “However, when he speaks of the group, we note that the communication does not refer to something exclusivist, but rather to the group of Spirits who seek the dissemination of truth”.
Mirroring is only a valid hypothesis when there is systematic confirmation of personal interests, vanity, authority, or infallibility. Communication, on the other hand, affirms:
– Limitation (“we don’t have all the answers”)
Tests and difficulties
No exclusive authority
No doctrinal innovation.
This weakens, rather than strengthens, his thesis on animism.
Analytical conclusion
Your comment demonstrates a lack of knowledge, both about Spiritist science and about our intentions. Furthermore, it shows a haste to judge without considering the article as a whole. Regarding the scientific aspect, we have always made it clear that, in order to move beyond our position as a mere laboratory with only partial observations—which we cannot, in any way, transform into "general opinion"—we need people interested in the only possible method: studying, devotedly, to spiritist science; to meet, to delve deeply into the essence of this science; to return, with seriousness, humility and method, to practice mediumship and, finally, to place oneself in a position of collaboration (and not in dispute) with other groups, like ours, as was done in Kardec's time.
PS: Before taking a critical stance, make sure you have dedicated yourself to the study of Spiritist science beforehand. This will help you avoid falling into these and many other errors.
Yours sincerely.