Superior spirits are always good and benevolent; in his speech we never find acrimony, arrogance, harshness, pride, bravado, or stolid conceit. They speak simply, advise and withdraw when they are not heard.<\/p>Kardec, Allan. Spiritist Magazine: October: 1858<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n3. \u2500 Let us replace what you promised by making us wait. \u2500 You mean: to satisfy your curiosity. It doesn't matter! I'll lend a little.<\/em> <\/p>\n\n\n\nComment:<\/em><\/strong> Kardec continues to ask the questions he thought necessary to assess the state of knowledge and intentions of that Spirit, confronting science with its answers. Most likely testing the Spirit <\/p>\n\n\n\n4. \u2500 Considering that you lived in the time of the pharaohs, could you tell us for what purpose the pyramids were built? \u2500 They are tombs; tombs and temples. There were large demonstrations.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n5. \u2500 Did they also have a scientific objective? \u2500 No. Religious interest absorbed everything.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n12. From the dual point of view of God and the soul, did the priests have healthier ideas than the people? \u2500 Yes. They had the light in their hands and while they hid it from others, they still saw it.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nComment:<\/em> Here it becomes clear how religions are used to control the people, subjugating them, completely without individual autonomy. It is clear that the priests knew and taught the initiates, but did not instruct the population. To this day it is so. <\/p>\n\n\n\n14. \u2500 What is the origin of the worship given to animals? \u2500 They wanted to turn man away from God and lower him under himself, giving him inferior beings as gods.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\npexels \u2013 Lady Escabia \u2013 3199399<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n15. \u2013 To a certain extent, the cult of useful animals can be understood; but that of unclean and harmful animals, such as serpents, crocodiles, etc., is not understood. \u2500 Man loves what he fears. It was a yoke for the people. The priests could not believe in gods made by their hands!<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nComment: The priests knew the teachings and kept them for a small circle of initiates. They did not instruct the people in order to subjugate them. This shows how religions are not autonomous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
18. How to reconcile the Egyptians' respect for the dead with their contempt and horror for those who buried and mummified them? \u2500 The corpse was an instrument of manifestations. As they thought, the Spirit returned to the body it had animated. As one of the instruments of the cult, the corpse was sacred and contempt persecuted anyone who dared to violate the sanctity of death.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nComment:<\/em> Interesting: the individual, taught this way, died believing it. Therefore, although he found his body preserved, he continued there, manifesting himself. It could be, in this way, an obstacle to their progress, which leads to the conclusion that it would be better to die as part of the people. In the same way that, even today, there are those who stay by the coffin, not wanting to leave it, because they believe in this same modernized dogma (we cannot forget that Christianity brought many of these Egyptian dogmas mentioned here to their beliefs).<\/p>\n\n\n\n19. \u2500 Did the conservation of the body allow for a greater number of manifestations? \u2500 Longer, that is, the Spirit returned for longer, as long as the instrument was docile.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n23. Did the teaching given in the Mysteries have the sole purpose of revealing extra-human things, or were the precepts of morality and love of neighbor also taught? \u2500 All this was very corrupted. The purpose of the priests was to dominate, not to instruct.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nComment:<\/em><\/strong> To this day they embalm the body<\/strong>! It's a very big attachment to matter!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t