Friar Gilson needs to study the Bible better

Below, I leave an excellent comment, posted on the Espiritismo de Verdade channel on YouTube, by my friend Antonio AG:

“"Friar Gilson needs to study the Bible better, which he claims to know so well, because when Jesus was accused by the priests (coincidence?) of having his miracles performed by the devil, He responded with a masterful syllogism!"

He taught that a kingdom divided against itself cannot stand, that if Satan casts out Satan, the kingdom will be divided against itself and will destroy itself.

The formula that Jesus gave for recognizing Good and Evil is to analyze the fruits of the tree: a good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and vice versa, nor can brackish water flow from a good spring.

It is necessary to see what fruits Spiritism produces. What do good Spirits teach and practice? Are their fruits good or bad? So as not to judge according to appearance, but rather with righteous judgment, as He advised us to do with all things.

Do you want to learn about true Spiritism? Click here.

The friar needs to study the Bible independently, not through the blurred lens of Catholicism, but to ascertain what it truly teaches and what it does NOT teach!

On the other hand, when the friar claims that the Bible does not teach the concept of past lives (which allows for return through reincarnation), observe what Jesus teaches in the episode of the man born blind:

When they asked Him who had sinned so that the man was BORN BLIND—his parents or the blind man himself—He answered that neither the blind man nor his parents had sinned so that he was born that way, but that the blindness from birth would be an instrument for the manifestation of God's glory in the person of the blind man!

The starting point of the blind man's life was being BORN blind, and the verb "to sin" is in the past tense, preceding the blind man's birth! Need I draw you a picture?

And note that Jesus, because of the great responsibility of his mission, never missed an opportunity to correct erroneous and dangerous beliefs.

In the episode with the Sadducees, who believed in nothing beyond this material life, the Master warned them that they were greatly mistaken because they did not know the Scriptures or the power of God. This is the problem of many Christians and their priests: not knowing the Scriptures.

It is necessary to dare and know how to question one's own beliefs, Friar Gilson. Leave the comfort zone of denominational Catholicism and immerse yourself in the pure Gospel!

"If Spiritism were that deceptive and evil doctrine that the friar claims, Jesus would certainly have condemned the Jewish belief in reincarnation at that time!"”




Brother Gilson, why do you contradict Jesus?

Recently, Friar Gilson declared that if someone finds healing through Spiritism, it is because "the devil can also heal." This statement is not new. It echoes the same accusation the Pharisees made against Jesus, saying that He cast out demons by the power of Beelzebub.

Jesus, however, rejected this absurd logic with an irrefutable argument:

“Every kingdom divided against itself will be destroyed, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand. And if Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then will his kingdom stand?” (Matthew 12:25-26)

Furthermore, He taught that A bad tree cannot bear good fruit.:

“By their fruits you will know them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.” (Matthew 7:16-18)

If there is healing in Spiritism, if there is comfort, if there is spiritual enlightenment, how can Frei Gilson claim that it comes from evil? Would Jesus himself have been wrong to say that a bad tree cannot produce good fruit?

The frivolousness of the attacks on Spiritism

Attacks on Spiritism follow a pattern: they are based on the most false ideas, the grossest distortions, and the repetition of unfounded accusations. Without understanding the Spiritist Doctrine, its critics condemn it. without study, without analysis, and often without any intellectual honesty..

The accusation that "the devil heals" is a classic example of a fallacy constructed to confuse people. If the devil had the power to heal, he wouldn't be an enemy of humanity, but a benefactor! Would Frei Gilson be willing to defend the idea that evil is dedicated to alleviating suffering? This logic, besides contradicting Catholic theology itself, is an outrage to common sense.

Accusing Spiritism of operating through the devil is a serious mistake. Spiritism is not based on occult rituals, magical practices, or the worship of entities. On the contrary, It is a doctrine that preaches reasoned faith, selfless charity, and the pursuit of truth above human conventions..

The commitment to Truth

Jesus clearly stated that he came. to bear witness to the truth (John 18:37) and that only the truth sets you free (John 8:32). But when Frei Gilson attributes something that produces good to the devil, he not only ignores the teachings of Jesus but also becomes a witness to the lie.

By spreading this falsehood about Spiritism, Who is Frei Gilson really with? If he is not telling the truth, he is not with Jesus. If he is spreading the same accusation as the Pharisees, wouldn't he be repeating their mistake?

Let each one reflect: Who benefits from distorting the teachings of Jesus to lead people away from the truth?




Friar Gilson's ...

It is regrettable that, almost 160 years after Allan Kardec organized the principles of Spiritism with method and rigor, we still have to deny absurdities that could be avoided with a simple reading of What is Spiritism.

Frei Gilson, like so many other critics who speak without knowledge, insists on distorting the Spiritist Doctrine, mixing it with practices of divination, magic, and esotericism. His approach is not based on study, but on the repetition of old misconceptions that have long since been clarified. The effect of such irresponsible statements is always the same: to misinform and fuel prejudice against knowledge he has not even bothered to understand.

@espiritismodeverdade

Friar Gilson's Frivolous Opinion on Spiritism It is regrettable that, almost 160 years after Allan Kardec organized the principles of Spiritism with method and rigor, we still have to deny absurdities that could be avoided with a simple reading of What is Spiritism? Friar Gilson, like many other unprepared critics, offers opinions on the Spiritist Doctrine without demonstrating the slightest understanding of its foundations. His statements confuse Spiritism with divination, magic, and esoteric practices that have nothing to do with Kardec's proposals. This type of irresponsible statement only perpetuates ignorance and misinforms those seeking to understand the Spiritist Doctrine. Spiritism: Science, Philosophy, and Moral Consequences Contrary to what misinformation preaches, Spiritism is not a set of rituals, does not involve mystical practices, and has no connection with divination. Kardec defines it clearly in What is Spiritism: "Spiritism is at the same time a science of observation and a philosophical doctrine." In other words, it is based on the rational analysis of spiritual phenomena and the search for understanding the nature of spirits and their relationship with the material world. Why doesn't Spiritism involve divination? Divination is based on the idea of predicting the future, usually through oracles or omens. However, Spiritism teaches that the future is not absolutely fixed, as free will is a fundamental principle of spiritual life. In The Spirits' Book, Kardec questions the spirits about this issue and receives the following answer in question 868: "If man knew the future, he would neglect the present and would not act with the same freedom." This demonstrates that any attempt to predict the future with absolute certainty goes against Spiritist principles. And what about magic? Magic, as popularly understood, involves the manipulation of occult forces and rituals to gain advantages. Spiritism opposes any superstitious practice. Kardec warns, in The Mediums' Book, that many deceptive Spirits exploit human credulity, encouraging deceptive practices. In Genesis, chapter II, Kardec reinforces: "Spiritism does not perform miracles or prodigies; it does not derogate the laws of Nature." Therefore, there is no room for mysticism or supernatural manipulation in the Spiritist Doctrine. Ignorance or bad faith? The question that arises is: are those who propagate such falsehoods truly unaware of Spiritism or are they deliberately distorting its teachings? The answer may vary, but the effect is the same: the perpetuation of lies that distance people from true knowledge. Spiritism has always been open to rational debate, unlike many dogmatic beliefs that condemn without study. Friar Gilson could at least have the intellectual humility to read What is Spiritism before passing judgment. But, like so many others, he prefers to offer opinions without proper knowledge. Do you want to know true Spiritism? In addition to the works of Allan Kardec, a fundamental read to understand how Spiritism deviated from its original principles in Brazil is *Autonomia – A História Jamais Contada do Espiritismo*, by Paulo Henrique de Figueiredo. This book clarifies how religious and ideological interests distorted the Spiritist Doctrine over time, distancing it from its original proposal of freedom of thought and scientific method. Let us be responsible when speaking about what we do not know. And, for those who wish to understand true Spiritism, the path lies in Kardec's works and serious studies, not in frivolous discourse. #hespiritism #spiritual doctrine #allankardec #freigilson #hespiritismoftruth

♬ original sound – True Spiritism

Spiritism: Science, Philosophy and Moral Consequences

Contrary to what its detractors preach, Spiritism is not based on rituals or mysticism. It relies on the rational investigation of spiritual phenomena and the search for understanding the nature of spirits and their relationship with the material world.

Kardec clearly defines this proposal in What is Spiritism (which you can download for free, clicking here):

“Spiritism is at the same time a science of observation and a philosophical doctrine.”

In other words, far from any superstitious practice, he proposes a serious study of spiritual reality, guided by logical reasoning and the experimental method.

Why doesn't Spiritism get involved with divination?

Divination is based on the belief that the future can be absolutely predicted. However, Spiritism teaches that the future depends on individual choices and circumstances that unfold over time.

Kardec addresses this issue in The Book of Spirits, question 868:

“If man knew the future, he would neglect the present and would not act with the same freedom.”

Therefore, Spiritism does not make deterministic predictions, as this would contradict the principle of free will and the very logic of spiritual evolution.

What about magic?

Magic, in the popular imagination, involves the manipulation of occult forces to obtain advantage. Spiritism opposes any such practice, as everything in it must be analyzed through the lens of reason and morality.

Kardec warns, in The Mediums' Book, about the existence of deceiving spirits who exploit human credulity. And in The Genesis, chapter II, he reinforces:

“Spiritism does not perform miracles or prodigies; it does not derogate the laws of Nature.”

In other words, it does not rely on rituals or magic formulas, but on the rational understanding of spiritual phenomena.

Ignorance or bad faith?

Those who insist on spreading misinformation about Spiritism do so either out of ignorance or deliberately. In both cases, the result is the same: perpetuation of prejudice and distancing from the truth.

Spiritism has always been open to rational debate, unlike dogmatic doctrines that condemn what they do not understand. Friar Gilson could at least have the intellectual honesty to read What is Spiritism before expressing his opinions. But, like so many others, he prefers to criticize without knowing.

The real reason for the attack on Spiritism

Frei Gilson's repeated statements about Spiritism, repeating the most absurd—and frivolous—ignorance, make clear the true motive behind these attacks. The Catholic Church, sustained by dogma and the subjugation of its faithful, has for centuries viewed with fear any idea capable of liberating consciences.

In the past, he burned at the stake those who dared to say they heard spirits, as this undermined the priestly monopoly on communication with the divine. Later, he persecuted heliocentrism and nearly condemned Galileo to the stake for stating the obvious. Later, he rejected fossil evidence, as evolution contradicted his dogmatic narrative. Now, his fight is against Spiritism, as it offers a rational Christianity, free from arbitrary impositions and based on freedom of conscience.

History repeats itself. And those who refuse to learn from it continue to spread the same old fallacies.

Do you want to know true Spiritism?

In addition to the works of Allan Kardec, an essential reading to understand how Spiritism was diverted from its original principles in Brazil is Autonomy – The Untold Story of Spiritism, by Paulo Henrique de Figueiredo. This work reveals how religious and ideological interests have distorted the Spiritist Doctrine over time, distancing it from its proposal for freedom of thought and rational inquiry.

Talking without knowledge is easy. But for those who truly wish to understand Spiritism, the path lies through serious study, not empty talk.




Spiritism Statistics – 6 to 7 million in 1868

In 1869, Kardec estimated that there were 6 to 7 million Spiritists, according to statistics he compiled. He compiled them based on data from subscribers to his magazines and his correspondence. This is how he explains the Spiritist Magazine of January 1869. He did not provide an approximate measurement because:

An exact enumeration of Spiritists would be impossible, as we have already said, for a very simple reason: Spiritism is neither an association nor a congregation; its adherents are not registered in any official registry. It is well known that one cannot assess the number by the number and importance of the societies, attended only by a tiny minority. Spiritism is an opinion that does not require any profession of faith and can extend to all or part of the principles of the Doctrine. It is enough to sympathize with the idea to be a Spiritist. Now, since this quality is not conferred by any material act, and implies only moral obligations, there is no fixed basis for determining the number of followers with precision. It can only be estimated approximately, based on relationships and the greater or lesser ease with which the idea spreads. This number increases daily, at a considerable rate; this is a positive fact, recognized by even its adversaries; opposition diminishes, clear proof that the idea finds more sympathy.

Spiritist Magazine of January 1869

In the same article, Kardec highlights;

Meanwhile, it can be said, without exaggeration, that, in short, the number of adherents has increased a hundredfold in ten years, despite the maneuvers employed to stifle the idea and contrary to the predictions of all those who boasted of having buried it. This is a fait accompli, of which the antagonists must be made aware.

Idem

Kardec addresses two categories of people in relation to Spiritism: those who consciously accept it after studying it and those who, although they do not yet identify as Spiritists, have intuitions and beliefs aligned with the doctrine. He emphasizes that Spiritist ideas arise naturally in many individuals, even without prior contact with Spiritism, which proves that these ideas are part of nature and tend to spread. Opposition to Spiritism, in many cases, is due to misperceptions based on distorted criticism. Once these people learn about the true doctrine, they will tend to accept it, becoming Spiritists in the future. Despite these considerations, Kardec did not include them in the study.

He also explains that, while it is impossible to obtain exact numerical statistics on the number of Spiritists, it is possible to analyze their distribution based on professions, social status, nationalities, and religious beliefs. Considering the variation in the number of people in each profession, it is possible to identify in which categories Spiritism has the most followers. In some cases, the proportion was calculated as percentages with good precision, although without mathematical rigor, while in other categories, the classification was based on the relative number of followers. These conclusions were obtained from over ten thousand observations.

generic statistics
world and people

Let's look at the (relative) numbers presented in the January 1869 edition:

Of the 11 items, we want to highlight this one, which deals with religious ideas. Here, Kardec makes clear the distance between Spiritism and religion. Once again, Spiritism was never a religion; Spiritism is a philosophical science. As a science, it investigates everything rationally; it can remain a religion and study Spiritism. Those with free thought and reasoned faith do not cling to dogma.

We were impressed that doctors and engineers topped this list. Kardec states in the article that for every hundred Spiritist doctors, at least eighty are homeopaths. This is because the principle of homeopathy brings them closer to spiritualism, and it is rare to find materialists among them, unlike allopaths. Homeopaths understand Spiritism better, identifying the properties of the perispirit as the basis of their system. Spiritists, in turn, recognize the rationality of homeopathy and defend it against unfair criticism, maintaining a balanced stance toward allopathy.

Since Magnetism and Spiritism are complementary sciences that explain each other, neither can fully evolve without the support of the other, functioning in an integrated manner, much like Physics and Chemistry or Anatomy and Physiology. Many magnetists intuitively recognize this connection and use their knowledge of magnetism as a way to approach Spiritism.

It's more difficult to understand the position occupied by certain industrial professions in this classification. One wonders, for example, why tailors rank first, while booksellers and printers, much more intellectual professions, are near the bottom. This is a fact that has been established for a long time, and we still haven't grasped the cause.

idem

There are a number of consequences of these results that Kardec found. Among them, we highlight:

That there are spiritists at all levels of the social scale. Furthermore, the vast majority of Spiritists are found among enlightened people, not among the ignorant. And nowhere did it first develop in the lower classes.

The curious thing is that after Kardec published his statistics on Spiritism, he presents, in the February 1869 edition, the assessment of these same statistics made by the newspaper Solidarity of January 15, 1869. In the article he refutes the numbers presented by Kardec, saying that Kardec made a big mistake because he did not count the followers from Asia.

We will highlight only a few excerpts, and leave the complete reading of this article to the reader. To read the article Click here

"We regret that we cannot reproduce, due to lack of space, the very wise reflections that Mr. Allan Kardec adds to these statistics. We will limit ourselves to noting with him that there are Spiritists at all levels of the social ladder; that the vast majority of Spiritists are found among enlightened people and not among the ignorant; that Spiritism has spread everywhere, from top to bottom on the social ladder; that affliction and unhappiness are the greatest recruiters of Spiritism, as a result of the consolations and hopes it gives to those who mourn and lament; that Spiritism finds easier access among nonbelievers in religious matters than among people with a fixed faith; finally, that, after fanatics, those most resistant to Spiritist ideas are those whose thoughts are entirely focused on possessions and material pleasures, regardless of their condition."

idem

“It is very wrong to Spiritist Magazine when she estimates the number of Spiritists for the entire world at only six or seven million. She obviously forgets to count Asia.

"If the term 'spiritists' refers to people who believe in life beyond the grave and in the relationships between the living and the souls of the dead, they must be counted in the hundreds of millions. Belief in spirits exists among all followers of Buddhism, and it can be said that it constitutes the foundation of all the religions of the Far East. It is widespread, especially in China. The three ancient sects that have long divided the populations of the Middle Kingdom believe in manes, in spirits, and profess their worship. ─ It can even be said that this is a common ground for them. The worshippers of So and of Fo there they meet the followers of philosopher Confucius.

“The priests of the sect of Lao-Tseu, and particularly the Tao-Tse, or doctors of Reason, owe a large part of their influence over the populations to spiritualist practices. These religious people interrogate the Spirits and obtain written answers that are no more or less valuable than those of our mediums. These are advice and warnings considered to be given to the living by the Spirit of a dead person. There are revelations of secrets known only to the one questioning, sometimes predictions that come true or not, but which are of a nature to shock the attendants and greatly stimulate their desires, so that they take charge. to carry out, themselves, the oracle.

“This correspondence is obtained by processes that do not differ much from the processes of our spiritists, but which, however, must be further perfected, if we consider the long experience of the operators who traditionally practice them.




Spontaneous Communication — The Renewal Movement

Concerned about the world's difficulties, the medium, Mrs. C., accustomed to this type of natural dialogue with Spirits, submitted a request for discussion on the matter, the answer to which is presented below.

In the spiritual world, there is a movement of renewal that will soon return to the realm of the incarnate; those who desire a new era where charity will prevail. The time for societal reforms will not be long in coming.

Destruction will bring renewal. Do not fear the difficult times, have faith, for we, who are the light of God, are constantly vigilant. We are inspiring the multitudes of incarnate beings who aim for the goals to which this new period will have its growth and its apogee.

The small, the underprivileged, the stateless will have their place in the world. The despots, the selfish and the proud, will also find their exile.

Prayers will sustain suffering humanity. Proactive attitudes will have their place and, above all, will overcome the vices of those who have not yet understood the grandeur of love for their neighbor.

The harvest of these efforts will transform the Earth and its people. Nature will take care of cleansing the places where respect and benevolence have not yet arrived. Remember that physical life is only a passage. Good Spirits will find their refuge, and the wicked will have their expiations.

Abstain from the revolt and hatred that corrodes your spirits and robs you of hope and faith.

Those who do not submit to the Creator's laws will be punished, as were all those who came before them. It is so, and always will be.

Raise your thoughts to God and seek in Him solace for your despair, which is normal, since you do not understand the grandeur of His work. The consciousness of Kardec's time regarding equality, liberty, and fraternity will resurface, even if suffering afflicts your physical bodies. Spiritism remains the path to achieving your goal.

Raise this banner: "Outside of charity there is no salvation." Instruct your neighbors, without fearing obstacles, persevere, pray, seek your own improvement, and encourage your peers to follow the same path.

We are with you in this fight. We are the light of God.

Friendly Spirit


Notes:

The communication itself is quite touching, direct, and helps to renew faith in the truth, already demonstrated by Spiritism, that the world is not ungoverned and that, despite the ill will of human beings, forgetful or careless about the essence of their being, Creation continues to develop, continues to march on, counting on those of good will like little ants carrying their grains, so that the mountain that will never crumble may be built.

It remains to add that the phrase “a Destruction will bring renewal.”"It refers to the destruction of the material, cyclical world, which serves the development of the spiritual element.".




Communications from Beyond the Grave — Allan Kardec

The medium Mr. D., seeking help from good Spirits, submitted the following appeal to the Spirit of Allan Kardec:

evocation(To Master Allan Kardec) I ask for your guidance, Master, for our mediumistic group.

Response (emphasis added): For all meetings, we advise you to prepare in advance, having the topic and questions ready for your studies. To the mediums, the pursuit of improving their faculties. Do you want to be good mediums? Then study, the regular practice of mediumship, and the uninterrupted pursuit of moral improvement is the right path. You don't need to practice excessively, without proper rest and without caution, so as not to attract charlatans.. But even a quarter of an hour of dedication, for example. Sincerity of intention will also help you. Ask yourselves why you are gathered here, consult your conscience, for Frivolous arguments attract only the frivolous and the mocking.. Faith is the instrument of reason, not just emotion. You will make it unshakable through study and meditation. Mediums, strive to be good mediums; collaborators who do not yet have their mediumistic faculty well developed, strive to have a good heart and faith. Q., I tell you that you are an inspired medium and a conscious psychophonist, without knowing it. Z., an inspired and intuitive medium. All mediums, strive to be good mediums..

Comments:

The communication was obtained by the medium D., a psychographer, in an environment separate from our group's meeting. Before asking this question, he concentrated on prayers and first sought the opinion of the Spirit of Saint Augustine, president of another mediumistic group with which he interacts.

Like all communications obtained within and outside our group, we subject it to the most rigorous critical examination, within our capabilities. We do this through a virtual document, shared among all of us, where we make observations and raise questions that, as needed, may be addressed in a new evocation (to the same Spirit, or to another that we deem appropriate to try to call upon), as you can see in an excerpt from another communication., to be discussed shortly:

Regarding the communication in response to the evocation of the Spirit of Allan Kardec, we had nothing to criticize. It seemed eloquent, direct, simple, and alerting, without circumlocutions or subterfuges—all characteristics of Allan Kardec, who communicated to make himself understood by all. Whether he himself communicated or whether the communication came through another Spirit, inspired by him, does not really matter, since the message arrived and fulfilled its purpose.

Yes, friends, even the spirit of Allan Kardec can be evoked and communicate, but the question will always be the intent and seriousness of the one who calls. As we know, calling out of curiosity or frivolity will end up arousing the interest of frivolous or impostor spirits, mystifiers.

We chose this brief message to open our article section entitled “Communications from Beyond the Grave,” where we will seek to follow in the footsteps of Allan Kardec, both in the analysis and presentation of communications, whether spontaneous or not., obtained in our environment or in other groups. We wish to be yet another example, another small light, still somewhat pale, shining in this dark night into which the Spiritist Movement has plunged, from which we hope that everyone may soon awaken—and this "soon" depends only on the will of each one. Gather together, friends. Study, persevere. Immerse yourselves in Kardec's pages so that you may emerge aware of the needs of this science, inspired by him to take your own steps. Into the night you will advance and, gathered together, you will do your part in illuminating this path. Private meetings, thus held, will always be of better quality than those held in heterogeneous environments and, above all, without study.

Ask yourselves why you are gathered here, consult your conscience, for frivolous reasons attract only the frivolous and the mocking.."”




Obstacles of Mediums

Mediumship is a faculty that allows interaction between the material world and the spiritual world. Allan Kardec, throughout his studies, observed that mediumship expresses itself in diverse ways and with distinct effects, which leads us to understand that there is no single way to establish communication with spirits. As he himself states, “mediumship is a multifaceted faculty”, which implies the variety of manifestations and experiences that it can generate.

Collaboration by Ceres Marcon

"Mediumship is a multifaceted faculty; it presents an infinity of nuances in its means and effects. Whoever is able to receive or transmit communications from Spirits is, for this very reason, a medium, regardless of the means employed or the degree of development of the faculty—from simple occult influence to the production of the most unusual phenomena."

Allan Kardec, Spiritist Review, February 1859

Among the countless mediumistic manifestations, one of the best known and most used is psychographyIn this type of mediumship, the medium acts as a channel for written communication with the spiritual plane, being one of the most common forms of manifestation in the field of Spiritism. When we address psychography, we can observe that mediums can be classified according to their degree of control over the process, and these classifications directly influence the obstacles they face throughout the development of this faculty.

There are three main types of psychographic mediums:

  • Intuitive mediums: These are those who receive inspiration from spirits but write consciously, with some control over what is being said. The communication is more indirect, with the medium receiving intuitions or guidance, but still maintaining control over the writing.
  • Mechanical mediums: These mediums become automatic channels for spirit communication. During the process of psychography, they have no conscious control over what is being written, which characterizes a more spontaneous and intense manifestation.
  • Semi-mechanical mediums: They represent a middle ground between the previous types. Although there is some influence of the spirit on the writing, the medium still maintains some degree of control and awareness over the process.

However, as Kardec warns us, even though it is a natural faculty, mediumship is not without its difficulties. He tells us:

"Although the faculty is not an exclusive privilege, it certainly encounters opponents, at least in the sense that it is understood. It is also true that it does not fail to present obstacles to those who possess it; it can be altered and even lost, and it can often be a source of serious disappointment."

Allan Kardec, Spiritist Review, February 1859

These words from Kardec remind us that mediumship, despite its accessibility to many people, is not simple. It can encounter resistance, both internal and external, and the medium may face obstacles of various kinds—from difficulty maintaining control over communications to the risk of being influenced by deceptive or malicious entities.

In his analysis, Kardec alerts us to the complexity of the causes of mediumship and how it can often manifest in individuals whose moral characteristics are not necessarily exemplary. He states:

"The gift of mediumship depends on causes still imperfectly understood, in which physical factors appear to play a large role. At first glance, it would seem that such a precious gift should only be shared by select souls. However, experience proves otherwise, for we find powerful mediumship in people whose morals leave much to be desired, while others, esteemed in every respect, lack it."

Allan Kardec, Spiritist Review, February 1859

From the above excerpt, we can see that, contrary to what one might assume, this mediumistic faculty is not an exclusive privilege of people of great moral virtue. Mediumship does not depend solely on the individual's purity or moral character, but involves a combination of factors, including physical and spiritual aspects that are not yet fully understood. This complexity can even result in powerful manifestations in individuals whose moral conditions are not ideal, while others, who could be considered more balanced, lack it.

Furthermore, Kardec also warns us:

“(…) the good quality of the medium is not only in the ease of communication, but solely in his ability to receive only good ones. Now, it is in this that his moral conditions are omnipotent; and it is also in this that he encounters the greatest obstacles.” 

Allan Kardec, Spiritist Review, February 1859

This statement is crucial to understanding that, for a medium, the quality of spiritual communications is related to the quantity or ease with which they receive messages, as well as their ability to discern and filter spiritual influences. The medium must be prepared to reject the influences of imperfect spirits and accept only messages from elevated and trustworthy spirits.

However, Kardec emphasizes that the medium's moral condition is of paramount importance. The medium's morality not only influences the type of communication they are able to receive, but also acts as a true "filter" to prevent them from being deceived or influenced by inferior or deceptive spirits. Therefore, the greatest obstacles for the medium are not only technical or physical difficulties, but also moral issues, which require constant vigilance and improvement.

In this sense, mediums must be in a constant process of self-knowledge and inner transformation. Mediumship is, by its very nature, an opportunity for growth, but it also demands great responsibility. The medium cannot be a mere passive channel, but must constantly seek moral elevation, ethics, and spirituality, so that their mediumistic faculties will be well-directed and bring benefits to themselves and others.

Therefore, the moral obstacles mediums face are often linked to a tendency to be carried away by ego, vanity, or the anxiety of "showing" their abilities. Humility, discipline, and detachment are essential qualities to ensure that the medium does not stray from the path of goodness and truth, thus minimizing the risk of disappointment or harmful communications.




Homosexuality and Spiritism

This is a rather complex subject, whose approach varies depending on the perspective used. Some attempt to address it through ideologies; others, through interpretations that disregard the very essence of human nature. There are even those who seek to justify human homosexual behavior by using the example of animals, as if it were merely an expression of instinctive and materialistic impulses. However, animals, lacking moral consciousness, can act in ways that, to human eyes, seem contradictory—as in cases of incest or infanticide. The issue of human behavior, however, cannot be resolved this way, as it involves the moral consciousness of the Spirit. Focusing on these points results in misunderstandings and discussions that lead nowhere. Discussing homosexuality in the context of Spiritism, from a doctrinal perspective, is therefore fundamental.

We must emphasize that Spiritism goes further and, because it is entirely moral, provides a simple and clear answer to the question: in everything, what matters is the Spirit, which has no gender, and its actions. Since the Spirit has free will, and as long as this free will does not result in harm to others, as in this case, it must be left free to act and its decisions must be respected.

The explanation that Kardec gives for what was known as an "anomaly" in his time, and which he demonstrates to be only "apparent," is as follows:

“If this influence of the corporeal life has repercussions on the spiritual life, the same happens when the Spirit passes from the spiritual to the corporeal life. In a new incarnation he will bring the character and inclinations he had as a Spirit; if he is advanced, he will be an advanced man; if he is late, he will be a late man.

By changing his sex, he will therefore be able, under this impression and in his new incarnation, to retain the tastes, tendencies and character inherent in the sex he has just left. This explains certain apparent anomalies in the character of certain men and women.”.

Therefore, there is only difference between man and woman in relation to the material organism, which is annihilated with the death of the body. But as for the Spirit, the soul, the essential, imperishable being, it does not exist, because there are not two kinds of souls.

Allan Kardec, RE, Jan/1866

It's worth repeating that science, in Kardec's time, defined such behaviors as anomalous. Kardec, using Spiritist theory, emphasizes that it is only an apparent anomaly, that is, it is not, in fact, an anomaly.

I dare go a little further than this explanation: what if the Spirit, having been female in several lives, deliberately chooses to incarnate as a man, maintaining her tendencies, in order to learn from them? What if she chooses this kind of test to help, setting an example? Furthermore, homosexuality can simply be an expression of the Spirit's nature, without necessarily requiring the "overcoming" of moral issues. Thus, orientation is not a test in itself, but a legitimate expression of the plurality of Spirits in their evolutionary journey.

The point is that we cannot judge an individual's past, much less see them as someone serving a punishment. Each Spirit is unique and expresses a plurality of equally valuable characteristics throughout their journey. Therefore, we must respect the choices of others, within the limits of ethics and charity, and always be ready to help and be helped, to teach and learn, to share and collaborate, without judging appearances.




Mediumship: study and practice

Under a striking title, we have another series of booklets from the Brazilian Spiritist Federation, divided into two volumes. We ask ourselves, without knowing it: why create a booklet if Kardec's works are already quite clear and concise in themselves?

Upon finding the PDFs of these booklets, the first thing that occurred to me was to research "evocations." I opened the PDF and searched for "evoca" (to address "evocar," "evocação," "evocações," "evocado," etc.). After all, a booklet that addresses the topic of mediumship in the Spiritist context... necessarily needs to address evocation, an indispensable tool in the mediumistic process. “Surprise”: nothing! Nothing, absolutely anything about evocations, in volume I, if not a reference to the question of prayer being an evocation. Let's move on to volume II. Perhaps they left it for this one, avoiding anticipating such an important topic. Another "surprise." In this volume, the following does appear:

Direct evocations of Spirits should be avoided, opting for their spontaneous manifestation: “Often, evocations offer more difficulties to mediums than spontaneous dictations […]”.45 It is up to spiritual direction to select the discarnates who should manifest themselves in the meeting.

The footnote refers to The Mediums' Book, but the passage was inserted out of context to give the false impression that it recommends not directly evoking spirits. In fact, Kardec is referring to the passage as indicating that evocations present more difficulties than spontaneous communications, since, in the latter, the spirit freely chooses the medium most suited to its communication, something that becomes more difficult in the case of evocations:

Because, as we have already said, fluidic relationships are not always established instantly with the first Spirit who presents themselves. It is therefore advisable that mediums not engage in evocations for detailed questions without being certain of the development of their faculties and the nature of the Spirits assisting them, for with those who are poorly assisted, evocations cannot have any authenticity.

Allan Kardec — The Mediums' Book

However, Kardec demonstrates that evocations are preferable to mediumistic communications, recommending that only groups that are certain of controlling the Spirits should engage in the latter:

“[…] not calling anyone in particular is opening the door to everyone who wants to come in.”

“Spontaneous communications have no drawbacks when we control the Spirits and are sure not to let the bad ones dominate”

Allan Kardec — The Mediums' Book

Further on, another occurrence of the term:

Ostensive mediums must also be instructed to:

[…]

  • Be aware of the inappropriateness of evoking a particular entity, relative or friend, during meetings, knowing that, at the right time, they will manifest themselves, with the support of spiritual guides.

Where they again insert a decontextualized reference to Kardec:

The natural desire of every aspiring medium is to be able to converse with the Spirits of people who are dear to him; however, he must moderate his impatience, because communication with a given Spirit often presents material difficulties that make it impossible for the beginner.

Allan Kardec — The Mediums' Book

Note that Kardec says: to the beginnerThis is not emphasized, and in the text, it ends up being presented as general guidance to mediums, adding to the previous statement—"Be aware of the inappropriateness of evoking a particular entity, relative, or friend, during meetings, knowing that, at the right time, they will manifest themselves, with the support of spiritual guides," which is completely false, since evocation was a tool used by Kardec and countless others, necessary for the necessary dialogue and questioning of the Spirits. Furthermore, in the rest of the booklet, there is no mention of the correct way to perform evocations or their usefulness, something that, logically, is addressed by Kardec in The Mediums' Book and other works.

Actually, none of this surprises me. The Brazilian Spiritist Federation being a Roustainguist institution, having acted to gradually divert the Spiritist Movement, it certainly would not be in its interest to focus precisely on the tool that, when resumed, will provoke their misfortune, since it will give the Spirits the opportunity to question, following in Kardec's footsteps, the various absurdities uttered and printed, without any care, by the FEB, for more than a century.

Just as ESDE – Systematic Teaching of the Spiritist Doctrine – is full of absurdities and deviations, worshipping the appreciation of Brazil, Heart of the World, work of a mystifying Spirit, these handouts also fulfill their purpose: to continue the diversion.

I repeat: Spiritism is studied in original, unadulterated works of Kardec (click to download) Run, run from FEB!




The Deviation of the Brazilian Spiritist Movement: The Influence of Roustainguism and Its Consequences

The Brazilian Spiritist Movement has a unique characteristic: it was profoundly influenced by the work of Jean-Baptiste Roustaing, especially after Bezerra de Menezes assumed the presidency of the Brazilian Spiritist Federation (FEB) in 1895. This influence brought to Brazilian Spiritism an interpretation that diverges from the teachings organized by Allan Kardec, imprinting a mystical and traditional Christian vision that contrasts with the original proposal of a scientific and philosophical doctrine.

The Spiritist Doctrine and Its Method of Control

Allan Kardec, in his mission to organize the teachings of spirits, developed a rigorous method of analysis and control, known as "universal spirit control." This method aimed to guarantee the coherence and authenticity of spiritual messages: only teachings validated by multiple communications, in different locations, and with consistent logic and morality were accepted. The goal was to protect Spiritism against illusions, falsehoods, and incoherent interpretations, ensuring that the doctrine remained grounded in rational and universal principles.

In the Spiritist Doctrine organized by Kardec, spirits evolve continuously and naturally, without the idea of an "initial fall" or atonement for "original sin." Incarnation is seen as a process of learning and progress, without the need for traditional religious justifications.

Roustaing and the Introduction of a Mystical Vision

Jean-Baptiste Roustaing, on the other hand, introduced a divergent interpretation of Spiritism. In his work The Four Gospels, he proposes concepts that include the theory of a "fluidic body" of Jesus and the idea of an "original fall of the spirits," approaching a spiritualized view of the Gospels that resembles traditional mystical and Christian doctrines. Unlike Kardec, Roustaing did not apply the method of universal control, accepting mediumistic communications he received through a single medium, Émilie Collignon, which brought a set of ideas that contrast with the doctrinal principles of Spiritism.

When Bezerra de Menezes took over the FEB, he introduced Roustaing's work into the movement, promoting The Four Gospels as a sort of official interpretation of the Spiritist Doctrine in Brazil. With this, the FEB began to emphasize a religious and Christian vision, introducing the idea of a "messianic role" for Brazil as the "Heart of the World, Homeland of the Gospel." This interpretation is evident in the eponymous work, attributed to the spirit Humberto de Campos and psychographed by Chico Xavier, which describes Brazil as the country chosen to lead the spiritual regeneration of humanity.

The Deviation of Spiritism in Brazil

The promotion of Roustainguism within the FEB had lasting consequences for the Brazilian Spiritist Movement. Over time, the emphasis on mysticism and messianic interpretations led to a less critical acceptance of spirit communications, lacking the analytical rigor advocated by Kardec. Works with mystical and nationalist interpretations, such as Brazil, Heart of the World, Homeland of the Gospel, were widely accepted, despite contradicting the impartial universalism and objectivity of the original Spiritist Doctrine.

This influence gave Brazilian Spiritism a religious and mystical character, distancing itself from the principles of scientific investigation and analysis. Instead of a rational doctrine centered on the progress and continuous learning of spirits, the Brazilian Spiritist Movement adopted elements that conveyed a spiritualized vision of the Gospel, transforming the doctrine into something hybrid, blending Spiritist concepts and religious dogma.

Conclusion

The impact of Roustainguism on the Brazilian Spiritist Movement resulted in a deviation that brought mystical and religious ideas into the doctrine, distancing it from Allan Kardec's original proposal. The FEB, under the influence of Bezerra de Menezes and Roustaing's followers, adopted practices that contradict the scientific and philosophical method of the Spiritist Doctrine, leading the movement to accept communications without the necessary analytical rigor and to promote interpretations that distort the rational essence of Spiritism.

This deviation continues to be a topic of debate and reflection among scholars and practitioners of Spiritism in Brazil, as it raises questions about the fidelity and preservation of the principles that Kardec established as the foundations of the doctrine.