The Brazilian Spiritist Movement has a unique characteristic: it was profoundly influenced by the work of Jean-Baptiste Roustaing, especially after Bezerra de Menezes assumed the presidency of the Brazilian Spiritist Federation (FEB) in 1895. This influence brought to Brazilian Spiritism an interpretation that diverges from the teachings organized by Allan Kardec, imprinting a mystical and traditional Christian vision that contrasts with the original proposal of a scientific and philosophical doctrine.

The Spiritist Doctrine and Its Method of Control

Allan Kardec, in his mission to organize the teachings of spirits, developed a rigorous method of analysis and control, known as "universal spirit control." This method aimed to guarantee the coherence and authenticity of spiritual messages: only teachings validated by multiple communications, in different locations, and with consistent logic and morality were accepted. The goal was to protect Spiritism against illusions, falsehoods, and incoherent interpretations, ensuring that the doctrine remained grounded in rational and universal principles.

In the Spiritist Doctrine organized by Kardec, spirits evolve continuously and naturally, without the idea of an "initial fall" or atonement for "original sin." Incarnation is seen as a process of learning and progress, without the need for traditional religious justifications.

Roustaing and the Introduction of a Mystical Vision

Jean-Baptiste Roustaing, on the other hand, introduced a divergent interpretation of Spiritism. In his work The Four Gospels, he proposes concepts that include the theory of a "fluidic body" of Jesus and the idea of an "original fall of the spirits," approaching a spiritualized view of the Gospels that resembles traditional mystical and Christian doctrines. Unlike Kardec, Roustaing did not apply the method of universal control, accepting mediumistic communications he received through a single medium, Émilie Collignon, which brought a set of ideas that contrast with the doctrinal principles of Spiritism.

When Bezerra de Menezes took over the FEB, he introduced Roustaing's work into the movement, promoting The Four Gospels as a sort of official interpretation of the Spiritist Doctrine in Brazil. With this, the FEB began to emphasize a religious and Christian vision, introducing the idea of a "messianic role" for Brazil as the "Heart of the World, Homeland of the Gospel." This interpretation is evident in the eponymous work, attributed to the spirit Humberto de Campos and psychographed by Chico Xavier, which describes Brazil as the country chosen to lead the spiritual regeneration of humanity.

The Deviation of Spiritism in Brazil

The promotion of Roustainguism within the FEB had lasting consequences for the Brazilian Spiritist Movement. Over time, the emphasis on mysticism and messianic interpretations led to a less critical acceptance of spirit communications, lacking the analytical rigor advocated by Kardec. Works with mystical and nationalist interpretations, such as Brazil, Heart of the World, Homeland of the Gospel, were widely accepted, despite contradicting the impartial universalism and objectivity of the original Spiritist Doctrine.

This influence gave Brazilian Spiritism a religious and mystical character, distancing itself from the principles of scientific investigation and analysis. Instead of a rational doctrine centered on the progress and continuous learning of spirits, the Brazilian Spiritist Movement adopted elements that conveyed a spiritualized vision of the Gospel, transforming the doctrine into something hybrid, blending Spiritist concepts and religious dogma.

Conclusion

The impact of Roustainguism on the Brazilian Spiritist Movement resulted in a deviation that brought mystical and religious ideas into the doctrine, distancing it from Allan Kardec's original proposal. The FEB, under the influence of Bezerra de Menezes and Roustaing's followers, adopted practices that contradict the scientific and philosophical method of the Spiritist Doctrine, leading the movement to accept communications without the necessary analytical rigor and to promote interpretations that distort the rational essence of Spiritism.

This deviation continues to be a topic of debate and reflection among scholars and practitioners of Spiritism in Brazil, as it raises questions about the fidelity and preservation of the principles that Kardec established as the foundations of the doctrine.

A correspondent asked about what would be this supposed distance, always affirmed by us, between the Spiritist Doctrine and the Spiritist Movement.

To her, we can answer in this way, to exemplify for everyone:

“B…, this is something that everyone really needs to study or seek information about, especially about the works mentioned ((

• In the sense of doctrinal changes: The Legacy of Allan Kardec, by Simoni Privato; Neither Heaven Nor Hell, by Paulo Henrique de Figueiredo; Final Point, by Wilson Garcia
• In the sense of knowledge about the doctrinal context: Autonomy: the never-told story of Spiritism, by Paulo Henrique de Figueiredo;
• In the real understanding of the Doctrine, in the essence proposed by Kardec, through the studies: Heaven and Hell and Genesis, both from the publisher FEAL, as the others are adulterated versions, still.)), because understanding and, hence, assuming new positioning, it needs to be a autonomous action. However, I can highlight some key differences between the Spiritist Doctrine (DE) and the current Spiritist Movement (SM):

• Evocations of spirits: DE was formed on them and demonstrated the need to be carried out, with method, to continue their development; ME recommends not doing it, provoking a wave of mediums who are only “available”, therefore, without control or learning objective.
• Generality of teaching: DE demonstrated the need to develop the spiritist study through the method of double control: universality and agreement of teaching and rational judgment; ME, infected by Roustaing, who saw a danger in this method (which would disprove her theories), started to take isolated communications as an expression of the truth, without reasoning.
• Life of the Spirit in Erraticity: DE demonstrated that emotions and physical sensations only exist for the attached Spirit; ME began to teach a fully materialized spiritual world, thus creating ideas of attachment harmful to the Spirit who disincarnates.
• Necessity of the incarnation: DE demonstrated that the incarnation is a necessity for the progress of the Spirit, in which he, even if involuntarily, plays his solidary role in creation. He removed the concepts of punishment and punishment as an arbitrary action of God, demonstrating that everything is the fruit of the conscious Spirit's choice; ME, under Roustainguist influence, inserted the false concepts of karma, redemption, law of action and reaction and law of return.
• Heteronomy x autonomy: DE demonstrated, throughout it, that the Spirit develops autonomously, being the first, if not the only, author of its choices; ME, influenced by Roustaing, started to deal with life in a heteronomous way – if I suffer, it is because I am receiving the return; if I have joy it is because I have been blessed, &c.
• Charity: DE demonstrated that charity is a disinterested action, fruit of the Spirit's duty, which consciously moves towards the good; ME started to treat charity as an external action, almost always only material. Due to the absence of DE studies, ME fails to do the good it could to help in the development of society through spiritist ideas.
• Moral: DE demonstrated that, all created simple and ignorant, the Spirits develop wrong and right, through the incarnations, choosing between acting in this or that way. There is no duality between good and evil. Some choose to repeat the mistake, developing imperfections from which they will be very difficult to get rid of, through reincarnation work, in a conscious and autonomous action; ME, influenced by Roustaing, started to treat the incarnation as a punishment, as if all the spirits that incarnate were imperfect.
• Method: DE has always demonstrated the way it would develop itself: through the study of human sciences, confronted, by reason, with the spiritist teachings, in the exchange of information with reputable groups spread all over the world; On the other hand, the ME practically does not study the fundamentals of DE, it has isolated itself in the centers in routines that include: monologues, almost always filled with all the errors mentioned above; passes, without knowledge of magnetism; and mediumistic sessions that, without method and without studies, lose the purpose and usefulness they could really have.

And so on.”

We see that the differences between the Spiritist Doctrine, in its origin, and what the Spiritist Movement professes or believes today, are profound and, almost always, harmful to the propagation of the Doctrine. Therefore, it is up to the voluntary effort of each one in honest and detached study, as well as in the fraternal and cooperative dissemination of knowledge.

Complementing the cited works, we cannot fail to point out the need to study the Spiritist Magazine, which demonstrates how the formation of the Spiritist Doctrine took place.